<html><head></head><body>Hi Daniel,<div><br></div><div>thanks for raising this point, as a member of both I'd indicate that the reason I joined both is so that they both have my money :). I can see a personal benefit to reduced friction, but have no need for reduced cost. That said, for those who can't afford to do that, a single, lower, "global supporter of freedom" membership cost would be a help.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Graham.</div><div><br><br><div><strong>
From:
</strong>
Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro>
<br>
<strong>
To:
</strong>
FSFE Discussion <discussion@fsfeurope.org>
<br>
<strong>
Sent:
</strong>
19/07/2017 11:34 AM
<br>
<strong>
Subject:
</strong>
dual FSF and FSFE membership
<br><br><blockquote class="mori" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px solid #CCC;padding-left:1ex;">(this was also queried on the FSF LibrePlanet list[1])
<br>
<br>Does either organization (FSF or FSFE) have a position on dual
<br>membership, being a member of both organizations?
<br>
<br>Was this contemplated when the relationship between the two
<br>organizations originated?
<br>
<br>Has there been any discussion about a reduced membership fee or offering
<br>a single joining procedure for people to join both organizations in one
<br>go? For example, on the membership form for one organization, people
<br>could tick a box to join the other at the same time for some additional
<br>fee that is potentially less than the outright fee for the other
<br>organization.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>1.
<br>https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2017-07/msg00011.html
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>Discussion mailing list
<br>Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
<br>https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
<br></blockquote></div></div></body></html>