<div dir="ltr">It's even worse than that: <a href="http://readwrite.com/2016/12/15/uber-at-odds-with-the-california-department-of-motor-vehicles-tl4/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=RWW&utm_content=Uber+told+to+pull+over+self-driving+fleet+by+California%27s+DMV">Uber's self-driving fleet</a><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Carsten Agger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:agger@modspil.dk" target="_blank">agger@modspil.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Yesterday, I received a LinkedIn email from a talent scout at
Uber asking if I'd like to work on their core infrastructure.</p>
<p> My reply:</p>
<p> "Thanks for reaching out, but this is not something I am
interested in. A bit on principle, as I won't work with Uber on
the grounds that </p>
<div class="m_-5326626187078971841text_exposed_show">
<p> * their apps are not free software </p>
<p> * I don't sympathize with their undermining of the taxi
business, replacing trained and insured drivers with what is
effectively what used to be called "pirate taxis" paying "app
taxes" to an American company. </p>
<p> All the best to you too,<br>
(signed)"</p>
<p>The first reason is really sufficient as I won't work with
proprietary software if I can help it (and right now I can,
thankfully), but the second would also be sufficient in itself
if their app *were* free software.<br>
</p>
<p>Best</p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p>Carsten<br>
</p>
</font></span></div>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discussion@lists.fsfe.org">Discussion@lists.fsfe.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.fsfe.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/discussion</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>