<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
* Alex Hudson wrote, On 05/11/08 11:37:
<blockquote cite="mid:49118579.6080201@alexhudson.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">David Gerard wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2008/11/5 MJ Ray <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mjr@phonecoop.coop"><mjr@phonecoop.coop></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Did anyone have an inkling that this was coming and kept pumping FDL'd
manuals into a wiki just in case? ;-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Uh, it's only been on the cards (GFDL and CC-by-sa compatibility in
some regard) for, what, two years now. If you're surprised, you
weren't paying attention, and it's hard to see that as a fault with
everyone else.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There's a rather large difference between "compatibility" and
"relicensing without an author's permission", though.
</pre>
</blockquote>
It's helped me make up my mind about the "or later" clause though... I
always thought the main issue would be trust of future as yet unknown
FSF leaders.<br>
<br>
I wonder that wikipedia wasn't just mentioned outright instead of a
vaguer sounding clause that has an additional unknown quantity of leaks<br>
<br>
Sam<br>
</body>
</html>