Official Firefox binaries non-free

[MJ Ray]

Alex Hudson wrote:
> Ah, I think we're talking at cross-purposes - while debian-legal is
> quite US-oriented, I understand that. I was talking more about our
> discussion on this list, though obviously you are mostly informed on
> this issue by the discussion on debian-legal.

I am not discussing the wider issue on this list. It should
be pretty clear that I was adding a summary and references
about the debian discussion mentioned by AKFoerster.
http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2005-April/004959.html

I then replied to your (inaccurate, IMO, maybe because it was
ignoring the laws different contributors were worrying about)
commentary, which I probably shouldn't have done.

Even so, you seem to be making a habit of incredible claims.