FSFE Finance
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Jul 26 10:41:21 UTC 2001
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Anders Lindback wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Miguel Neves skrev:
[ Scenario where a company makes a lot of employees members and
democratically takes over. ]
> > Tell me how do you protect yourself from this scenario?
> Most programmer knows you can solve a problem by adding an extra indirection.
Most programming rules do not work with human organisations.
> By having a represetnative assembly on the european level and
> a direct democracy in the chapter level it's impossible to take
> over FSFE.
A Multinational company?
> To be able to do a hostile take-over one first has to take control of
> several national sharpters and use these powers to control the european
> board. But the european level has the possibility to revoke the membership
> of a chapter. It means that as soon there is revolution in
> one chapter that shapter can lose it's status as a chapter and no longer
> have a any power within FSFE. Nobody can thus take over the
> orgnasation.
It does not work.
There must be a reason for the european board to dismantle the membership.
How do they decide what is a revolution or not?
We can add time and more administrative levels, but this will be the
same problem.
> Any more objections against allowing everyone who wants to become a mamber ?
You have not responded to all the arguments (referenced in my last mail)
why the FSFE has choosen this structure.
I have now addressed your objections against the current FSFE structure.
Any more more objections against the current FSFE structure? :)
Bernhard
--
Professional Service around Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20010726/a5dc4d7d/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list